| In a recent lawsuit against Amazon.com, a supplier is
alleging Amazon is adopting unfair business practices because it is
advertising its products even though they have no stock of them and none
on order.
Alpha International has filed a lawsuit against Amazon.com, claiming
the company has used false and misleading statements on the Amazon.com
web site. In a press release issued by Alpha International, Connie
Keener, CEO of Alpha International is quoted as saying "Amazon.com
is damaging our credibility with our wholesale and retail
customers.''
According to Alpha, the company has sold products to Amazon.com for
resale to the public in the past, specifically the Gearbox 1940 Ford
fire truck riding pedal car. The company claims that Amazon illegally,
improperly and falsely states at its web site that the Gearbox fire
truck is not in stock but will contact the customer when the truck is
available. Meanwhile, according to Alpha, Amazon.com has not placed any
recent orders with Alpha International and there are no back orders.
Alpha suggests its wholesale customers and potential customers
competing with Amazon.com improperly believe Amazon.com is receiving the
product from Alpha at a substantially lower price than is offered to
them. The result is that the company claims to be loosing sales.
I assume Alpha didn't mind Amazon.com promoting its
products when it was buying them! This case raises an interesting
question regarding the ability of an eRetailer to advertise products
that are not in stock. Given that so many eRetailers do not carry stock
of any products, it is hard to see how this can be effectively
prevented. Nor is it likely that Amazon.com would knowingly advertise a
product that it is out of stock since this is hardly good customer
service.
Given today's highly automated websites that track
inventory positions automatically, it is highly likely products will go
into an out-of-stock position without any human intervention. Does this
highlight some underlying devious plot by Amazon or perhaps just a
supply-chain blunder being exploited by Alpha International? I suspect
the latter, how about you?
Amazon.com's official response: "the lawsuit is
completely without merit" ........ well, what did you expect?
Your Opinion Matters!
We use your feedback to determine potential future
research and to provide analysis on industry events.
Is this a fair case? Should suppliers be able to sue retailers who go
out of stock on their products and fail to remove the products from
their website? Should eRetailers simply avoid the problem altogether by
designing systems that will not display out-of-stock items? What does
this say about the legal system in the US, where people can file law
suits without worrying about picking up the costs if they lose? (OK,
maybe that's a little deep)......click
here for our online opinion form or email us using this link: mailto:feedback@eretailnews.com?
Other stories
Amazon.com Launches
French Store
Webvan adds Baby Shop and Kids'
Store
Beyond.com Launches Professional
Services Organization for eStores
Sharper Image
Shows Strong Summer Growth
Using old media to access new media!
Play Co plans launch of European
site in October
Nigel Fenwick 08/31/00
Source: Alpha International announcement
FREE
NEWSLETTER, click here
|