| When it comes to weak holiday sales, it wasn't
the weather, rising energy costs, an uncertain stock market and economy or
decreased consumer spending that took the wind out of U.S. retailers'
sails -- it was lack of selection and failure to live up to customer
expectations that tightened purse strings last month. That's the
conclusion reached by Meridian, a supplier of integrated strategic
planning and communications for the retail industry, after its in-depth
national survey of shoppers conducted at the close of the 2000 holiday
season.
The survey, which queried consumers on their actual spending, where
they shopped and why, also found that 42% of consumers reported spending
more during the 2000 holiday season, while only 29% said they spent less.
But with an average of 38 gifts on their shopping lists, where they spent
their money was far more dependent on selection -- finding what they
wanted -- than on price. Superior selection has become the major driver of
customer shopping behavior.
"Many retailers continue to erroneously focus on price -- using
sales, discounts and coupons -- as their primary lure to customers,'' said
Bob Gordman, president of strategic business planning at Meridian.
"Yet selection was named twice as often as price as the reason for
spending at a store. And that held true across all retail channels --
discount, midline, department and specialty stores."
"A significant 42 percent of consumers shifted their purchasing to
a different store this year, and selection was the reason they cited,''
Gordman continued. "The message that comes through loud and clear is
that when the product is right, price is secondary. Right pricing has
become a given -- the new battle is about retaining and attracting
customers by providing what they want.''
Gordman noted additional findings indicate many retailers failed to
meet their customers' expectations for "the right stuff.'' Forty-five
percent of shoppers were not impressed by any store they visited, and
two-thirds could not name a store that they thought was interesting. And
despite the millions of sale coupons run by stores in their advertising,
less than one-third of consumers surveyed cited using even one coupon.
Further documentation that price is no longer the primary driver is that
few customers were willing to move down-channel in their spending.
Instead, they tended to buy fewer items if they could not find just what
they wanted.
"Today's winners in retailing are those that know their customers
and match their merchandise offerings to customer expectations,'' stated
Gordman. He pointed to the merchandise selection and customer knowledge
employed by both Talbot's and Kohl's as major contributors to their
success during the holiday season.
What conclusions can be drawn from the Holiday 2000 experience? Among
Meridian's observations are that many retailers have lost sight of their
strategies and their customers. They are reacting to their competition and
focusing on monthly comp store increases and quarterly results rather than
their target customers' interests. Aversion to risk has contributed to
bland selection and stale merchandise assortments, rather than aggressive
commitments to the "power items'' that drive the business and give
customers reason to buy. Success during the critical Holiday selling
season -- and in 2001 -- calls for fresh inventory, interesting
merchandise choices, and advertising that is creative -- not repetitive
and sale-oriented.
"Our study details how and why stores are gaining and losing
customers every day. The winners are those gaining more than they lose.
Success is driven by knowing exactly which customers you are trying to
serve and having a firm grasp on what they expect from you. That's what
should dictate a retailer's direction,'' stated Gordman. "That's the
essence of having the right stuff in retailing today.''
Meridian conducted the survey of 2000 Holiday Shopping Trends in
partnership with Wiese Research Associates, Inc. The national survey was
done with a random sample drawn using RDD methodology and was
representative by state. The interviews were completed from December 26,
2000 to January 4, 2001. The maximum expected standard error range of 3.5
percentage points at 95% confidence level.
Source: Meridian Inc
01/29/00
FREE
NEWSLETTER, click here
|